Posts

Why Your Company's Communication Training is Failing (And It's Not What You Think)

I watched a middle manager at a Fortune 500 company spend forty-five minutes in a "communication skills workshop" learning how to make eye contact. Forty-five bloody minutes. On eye contact. While her team was back at the office dealing with a client crisis that could've been resolved in ten minutes with one honest phone call.

That's when it hit me: we're training people to communicate like robots when what they really need is permission to be human beings.

After seventeen years running communication workshops across Australia—from mining companies in Perth to tech startups in Melbourne—I've seen the same pattern everywhere. Companies spend thousands on professional development courses that teach employees to sound like corporate press releases instead of actual people. Then they wonder why customer complaints are up and staff engagement is down.

The Real Problem Isn't What They're Teaching

Here's what most trainers won't tell you: 89% of communication breakdowns happen because people are trying too hard to sound "professional." They've been conditioned to believe that authenticity equals unprofessionalism.

I remember working with a customer service team in Brisbane where every representative had been trained to say "I understand your frustration" before actually understanding anything. Customers could sense the script from a mile away. When we scrapped the templates and taught them to simply listen first, their satisfaction scores jumped 34% in two months.

But here's the controversial bit—most communication training fails because it's designed by people who've never had to deal with real workplace pressure. Academic consultants who think conflict resolution happens in sterile meeting rooms rather than in the heat of deadline-driven chaos.

The best communicators I know learned their skills in the trenches, not from PowerPoint presentations about "active listening techniques."

Why Authenticity Beats Technique Every Time

Take Sarah from a Sydney accounting firm I worked with last year. Brilliant with numbers, hopeless at small talk. Her previous training had taught her to mirror body language and use inclusive language frameworks. She looked like she was performing interpretive dance during client meetings.

Instead, we focused on what she already did well: asking precise questions and explaining complex concepts simply. Within weeks, clients were requesting her specifically because she felt real. Not polished. Real.

Here's what the textbooks don't mention: people can smell insincerity faster than burnt toast. All the communication techniques in the world won't help if you're not being genuine. Yet most corporate training programs are essentially advanced courses in professional fakery.

The Australian Advantage (That We're Throwing Away)

We Australians have a natural communication advantage. We're direct, we cut through bullshit, and we don't take ourselves too seriously. But corporate Australia is systematically training this out of people in favour of American-style corporate speak.

I've watched mining supervisors who could clearly explain complex safety procedures to new apprentices suddenly become tongue-tied when asked to present to management. Not because they lacked knowledge, but because they'd been told their natural communication style wasn't "executive appropriate."

That's madness.

Some of the best leaders I know communicate like they're having a yarn at the pub, not delivering a TED talk. They use short sentences. They ask simple questions. They admit when they don't know something. Revolutionary stuff.

What Actually Works (Based on Real Results)

After years of trial and error, here's what I've found actually improves workplace communication:

Stop teaching scripts. Start teaching principles. When people understand why they're communicating (not just how), they make better decisions in real-time situations.

Practice with pressure. Role-playing in calm workshop environments is useless. Practice difficult conversations when people are stressed, interrupted, and dealing with multiple priorities. That's when real communication happens.

Focus on questions, not answers. The best communicators aren't great talkers—they're great question-askers. Train people to be curious, not clever.

I worked with a construction company where the project managers were constantly having disputes with subcontractors. Traditional training would have focused on "conflict resolution techniques." Instead, we taught them to ask better questions earlier in projects. Disputes dropped by 60% because issues were identified before they became problems.

The Technology Trap

Another thing driving me mental: companies investing in communication apps and platforms while ignoring basic human interaction skills. I've seen teams that can collaborate brilliantly on Slack but can't have a five-minute face-to-face conversation without awkwardness.

Technology should enhance communication, not replace it. But we're creating a generation of workers who can write a perfect email but freeze up when asked to pick up the phone.

Had a client recently—tech company in Melbourne—where the developers would send emails to colleagues sitting three desks away rather than walking over. The CEO was baffled why team cohesion was poor. Sometimes the old ways are still the best ways.

Why Most Training Fails the Real-World Test

Here's something most trainers won't admit: they design programs based on ideal scenarios that rarely exist in actual workplaces. They assume people have time to carefully consider their words, that conversations happen without interruptions, and that everyone involved is rational and well-rested.

Reality check: most workplace communication happens under pressure, with incomplete information, between people who may not particularly like each other.

I once observed a "difficult conversation" workshop where participants practised in pairs while sitting comfortably with notepads and water bottles. Meanwhile, the real difficult conversations in their workplace were happening in corridor ambushes, during crisis meetings, and in the car park after frustrating client calls.

The gap between training room theory and workplace reality is why so many people feel like communication training is a waste of time. Because often, it is.

The Return on Investment Reality

Companies love asking about ROI on communication training, but they're measuring the wrong things. They track workshop attendance and satisfaction scores instead of actual behavioural change.

Real ROI comes from fewer misunderstandings, faster problem resolution, and improved client relationships. But these improvements happen gradually, over months, not immediately after a half-day workshop.

Best results I've seen came from companies that treated communication development as an ongoing process, not a one-time event. Like physical fitness—you can't get fit in a day, and you can't maintain fitness without regular practice.

What I'd Do Differently (If I Ran The World)

If I could redesign corporate communication training from scratch, I'd start with this: spend one day observing how people actually communicate in their workplace before designing any training.

Most consultants create programs based on theoretical best practices rather than addressing actual communication breakdowns. It's like designing a car without ever seeing a road.

I'd also scrap the generic programs. Communication challenges in a law firm are completely different from those in a manufacturing plant. Cookie-cutter solutions produce cookie-cutter results.

And I'd make it mandatory for all training designers to spend at least six months working in the industries they're training for. Academic credentials are fine, but there's no substitute for understanding what it feels like to handle an angry customer when you're running behind schedule and your manager is breathing down your neck.

The Bottom Line

Your communication training is probably failing because it's teaching people to be less human, not more effective. It's prioritising polish over authenticity, techniques over understanding, and theory over practice.

The companies getting real results from communication training are the ones brave enough to let their people be themselves—just better versions of themselves.

Stop trying to turn everyone into corporate clones. Start helping people communicate as effectively as they already do in their personal lives.

Most people can successfully negotiate with teenagers, resolve neighbourhood disputes, and explain complex topics to their elderly parents. The skills are already there. The training just needs to help people apply them at work without losing their humanity in the process.

That's not what most communication trainers want to hear. But it's what your employees—and your customers—desperately need.